Political explanations in comparative foreign-policy research typically center on the assumption that foreign-policy decisionmakers in democratic regimes are far more politically constrained than are their counterparts in authoritarian polities. Disputing this assumption, Hagan draws on case studies of the politics of foreign policy in a variety of non-U.S. settings to develop direct measures of actual political opposition and thus to capture its pervasiveness across all types of political systems.
The book includes an extensive empirical analysis of the foreign-policy behaviors of eighty-eight political regimes identified in a diverse set of thirty-eight national political systems. Using innovative measures of the strengths and orientations of various types of opposition, he shows that the behaviors of highly constrained regimes are marked by distinctive levels of commitment, initiative, and hostility. The magnitude and direction of the linkages between opposition and foreign-policy making are, however, conditioned in complex ways by regime vulnerability and political system accountability and institutionalization.
This analysis demonstrates the practicality of cross-national research on political influences and points to the value of incorporating regime concepts into broader examinations of such phenomena as interstate wars and foreign-policy restructurings.
"Digs beneath the shiny veneer of institutional structures to uncover and highlight the rich texture of domestic politics lying just below the surface.... Hagan meticulously reviews scores of (non-U.S.) case studies to demonstrate (1) that political oppositions can be found across a broad spectrum of institutional structures from parliamentary democracies to various Third World systems and (2) that such oppositions do indeed matter in the conduct of foreign policy."—American Political Science Review
"Illustrates not only the theoretical arguments about political opposition and foreign policy, but [also] how the research process, from beginning to end, ought to be undertaken."—The Journal of Politics
"A very impressive scholarly effort that is sure to make a genuine contribution to our understanding of how domestic politics influences foreign policy."—William J. Dixon