ISBN: 978-1-55587-600-5 $24.95 | ||
1995/402 pages/LC: 95-9032 |
The book addresses fundamental areas of concern: the relationship between economic growth and equity; import substitution vs. export-oriented strategies; the role of transnational corporations; new objectives for both market and state; employment and unemployment; inflation; debt; and the impact of neoliberal adjustment policies. Chapters new to the second edition touch particularly on persistent inflation, populist economic policies, women in the work force, poverty, structural adjustment, and the neostructuralist alternative to neo- liberalism.
The section introductions identify key issues in the readings and, where appropriate, suggest approaches to the problems explored.
This is the perfect book for use as a core text in combination with other collections, or as a complement to a text such as Cardoso and Helwege's Latin America's Economy.
James L. Dietz is professor of economics at California State University, Fullerton. His many publications include Economic History of Puerto Rico and Progress Toward Development in Latin America: From Prebisch to Technological Autonomy (coedited with Dilmus James).
"A well-organized compilation of superb articles ... deserves to be considered for adoption by any instructor who teaches an advanced undergraduate or a graduate course on Latin America’s economy or by students interested in the same.... it should also be required reading by anyone who would like to understand Latin America from a non-orthodox perspective and who would like to have an introduction to institutional and structuralist economic thought.... Included in the volume are lively and interesting analyses of many current issues.... Students, faculty, researchers, and activists will want to read the entire volume once they have read the first chapter."—Janet M. Tanski, Journal of Economic Issues
From the reviews of the first edition:
"Intended primarily for classroom use, this eminently readable volume succeeds in its objectives. . . . Convincingly demonstrates that neoclassical economic thinking is not the only way to understand the problematic of Latin American development."—Latin American Research Review